Motorcycle man charged with videotaping a State Trooper

This is something that fuels the debate between what is “free” and what is “right”.  What the clip below of CNN’s report on the issue.

Who do you agree with? 

I am more inclined to agree with the motorcycilist and the ACLU.  Despite the fact that the man was speeding and becoming a wreckless endangerment, I don’t think he was wanting to film himself riding with the hopes of getting into a chase, with the chance of having his license revoked.

The state trooper should not have pulled his gun.  He should have flashed his badge, identified himself, and gone from there.  What regular John Doe citizen is going to have a good reaction when a Chevy Impala pulls up and a plain clothes man gets out with a gun?  Oh boy, a man with a gun!

The fact is, is that there are a lot more people to prosecute other than some stupid speeder who happens to have a camera on his helmet, and an over reacting cop gets out with gun drawn and waits at least five seconds to identify himself.  What person would have a good reaction to this?

Where is Constitutionally or morally right to confiscate a man’s computers all on the basis of him posting a video on You Tube?

Would taping things such as this merit you getting put in the slammer?  Or this?  Or watch how Sean Hannity’s buddy Oliver North is protected in refrence to REX-84.


F.B.I.: Domestic militias just as much a threat to national security as al-Qaeda

A person close to me said that the American people will rise up against the governmet.  I’m thinking thats not going to happen, and for several reasons.  People have families, they have lives, and the government has it’s hands in every aspect of American life.  We live in a debtor nation of tyranny.

Granted the government is not shooting us on the streets, but think of it this way, when you find yourself living in fear that the government is going to fine you, imprison you, or something else for something as petty as Obamacare, the census, or even down to the plates on your car, that’s tyranny.

Here’s another sign of freedom on life support for you: John McCain and Joe Lieberman are co-sponsoring a bill that would give the government power to indefinately detain Americans – S. 3081.

So what would happen if the American people revolted in mass amounts?  The president would sign a whole crap load of executive orders, martial law would be declared, and the infamous FEMA camps that you have heard about will be activated.

Absent some miracle that Congress gets terms limits, the Federal Reserve is abolished, and the government is open for a thorough investigation, the chance of the American people coming together in a cohesive fashion to have a second revolution is largely impossible.

Fifteen years after the Oklahoma City bombing, the spectre of domestic terrorism has returned to haunt the Obama Administration, with a warning from the FBI that “home-grown and lone-wolf extremists” now represent as serious a threat as al-Qaeda and its affiliates.

The warning, from the FBI Director, Robert Mueller, came as the former President Clinton drew parallels between the Oklahoma City tragedy and a recent upsurge in anti-government rhetoric, while American television audiences heard Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, describe the “absolute rage” that drove him to plan an attack that killed 168 men, women and children.

An FBI spokesman told The Times yesterday that Mr Mueller was referring to right-wing extremist groups and anti-government militias, as well as American Islamists, in his testimony to the Senate committee that must approve the FBI’s $8.3 billion (£5.4 billion) budget.

Last month federal agents arrested nine members of a Christian militia based in Michigan, calling itself the Hutaree. They have been charged with plotting to murder local police with a stash of guns, knives and grenades.

Since the passage of President Obama’s health reforms, the FBI has also made arrests in Seattle and San Francisco after death threats were sent to Democratic senators.

“It’s one thing to express dissatisfaction with the Government but once you cross the line with a violent threat, that’s a violation that we take extremely seriously,” Bill Carter, the bureau’s spokesman, said.

The Oklahoma bombing was followed by an exhaustive civilian trial in which McVeigh became a hate figure to most but a hero to some members of the survivalist fringe on which he was radicalised.

He was executed in 2001, but not before granting 45 hours of death-row interviews to the authors of a book, American Terrorist, whose tapes will be broadcast for the first time on Monday. McVeigh never confessed to the bombing in court but he appears to do so on the tapes.

“I feel no shame for it,” he says. “This was something that I saw as a larger good, and I know that, as I analysed the history of not just the US, but all nations throughout the history of mankind. People have killed for what they believed was the greater good, and it’s accepted. Sometimes killing is accepted.”

The White House was careful to emphasise that the threat of external terrorism remained acute but senior officials are privately confident that military operations in Afghanistan are going well and putting al-Qaeda on the back foot. Few people in Washington are as confident about the domestic threat.