Lindsay Graham: Kill the First Amendment

The prominent Republican who once said that this was “not a Ron Paul” Republican party has now advocated destroying the First Amendment.  This should come as no surprise since Graham is an establishment politician. 

Not long ago in the local paper I read where Alabama and including Alaska were trying to pass anti-Sharia Law bills.  If passed, they would effectively ban this Muslim practice from these respective states.  What ever happened to an Americans free right to practice religion however they see fit?  Can you imagine if state’s tried to pass laws banning certain Christian practices?

Granted down through the decades Christianity has caught the ire of certain persons, and look at the reaction.

“Any time someone carries a picket sign in front of the White House, that is the First Amendment in action.”  Julian Bond

Kurt Nimmo
April 4, 2011

In response to the idiotic and pointless burning of the Koran by a Florida pastor and the deadly riots that followed in Afghanistan, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has proposed limiting the First Amendment.

“I wish we could find a way to hold people accountable. Free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war,” Graham told CBS’ Bob Schieffer on Sunday.

Graham mentioned government censorship of the First Amendment during the Second World War. FDR signed Executive Order 8985 in December of 1941 and established the Office of Censorship. The order gave a legion of bureaucrats “absolute discretion” over the exercise of the First Amendment and the free speech of all Americans.

In the years following FDR’s decree, the government attempted to squelch free speech a number of times for political reasons, most notably in regard to the Pentagon Papers. During Bush Senior’s invasion of Iraq in 1991, the Pentagon revisited wartime censorship and prevented journalists from independently reporting the news. Bush and Reagan tightly controlled the flow of information during the invasions of Panama and Grenada.

In 2004, then vice president Dick Cheney outlined what Americans should expect henceforth – a war against shadowy enemies that will last generations.

President Bush went so far as to tell NBC’s Matt Lauer it was possible the war could never be won, while Democrat John Kerry said terror would probably never be done away with, but that it might be reduced to a “nuisance.”

Graham reminded us that our rulers have in mind a forever war not unlike the one envisioned by Joe Haldeman in his Hugo-winning 1976 novel by the same name. It is said Haldeman wrote the science fiction novel in part as an antiwar response to Robert Heinlein’s fascistic Starship Troopers. Haldeman served in Vietnam.

It seems Graham and his neocon fellow travelers are in agreement with Heinlein’s premise in the novel that social responsibility requires being prepared to make individual sacrifice, especially when humanity is engaged in a never-ending “Bug War.” A character in the novel, Colonel Dubois, specifically criticizes the Declaration of Independence as naïve and unrealistic.

According to neocon globalist faction, our once proud heritage of liberty and its reflection in the Bill of Rights has “no contemporary relevance,” as Georgetown University law professor Randy Barnett noted in 2007. “Sure it was fine that persons should be secure in their papers and effects back in the old days when there wasn’t a danger of terrorism and mass murder,” said the professor in regard to the Fourth Amendment. It is “archaic [and] we don’t need it anymore.” Strangely, Mr. Barnett is considered a libertarian.


Stay retired Garth Brooks

I realize that I maybe the only one in the whole wide world thinking this, but Garth Brooks needs to stay retired.  Who cares if he’s sold millions of albums and holds records, but who can really stay a fan of someone that retires, comes back, retires, just to come back again.  I would get tired of it.

Now I realize to Garth Brooks fans out there that he broke their hearts to spend more time with his family, which is commendable.  But take a look at country music singers like Travis Tritt, Tim Mcgraw and Faith Hill, and many others who have families, they don’t retire just to play with their fans heartstrings by not being able to make up their minds. 

You can say he does it because he misses the road, the music, or the fans, but the truth is, Garth Brooks is afraid of competition.  He’s afraid of being forgotten.  With the rising popularity of so many country music singers, one person in particular, George Strait, who needs Garth when they could have George?  George is a better singer, a better entertainer, and Garth only gives to charity when the cameras are on and the lights are flashing.  Seriously, I don’t want to go to some concert and constantly have to worry about whip lash because the singer cannot stay at the front of the stage.  And I really don’t want to take the time to listen to words through heavy breathing because he ran himself breathless.

The indecison of Garth Brooks is getting about as old as the indecisiveness of Michael Jordan or Brett Favre.  Make up your mind!