Everyone, including myself, championed Sen. Rand Paul (R), Kentucky, when he put the Obama administration on the spot in relation to the use of drones on American soil.
Now we may be thinking differently.
I know I’m a little late on this topic, but you know what they say – better late than never. Anyway, Rand Paul went on Fox News Business with Neil Cavuto and said that if someone robs a liquor store, runs around with fifty dollars in their pocket, he has no problem with a drone strike taking them.
Okay, Senator, what if that drone strike kills a cop? A civilian? What if that gunman runs into someone’s garage and a sleeping families lives are snuffed out? – all because YOU had no problem with a heat seeking missile splattering someone’s guts all over the place?
Is that considered acceptable collateral damage? Watch the news clip:
Senator Paul, just what do you believe?