Abortion, Barack Obama, and John P. Holdren

Since its start into the American society; abortion has murdered more than fifty million babies.  Now before I get into the news, here is my take on the issue of a “woman’s right”.  It’s disgusting.  It’s murder.  It’s legalized genocide.  We spend all of these trillions of dollars funding corrupt governments around the world because our politicians and television sets tell us that if we don’t send one penny, someone will die.  If we don’t invade this country and that country, someone will die.  If we didn’t take out Saddam Hussein, he would have unleashed an un-Godly plague upon the world.  And yet, Americans can go to sleep at night knowing that while we are “so concerned” with the welfare of some bureaucrat in a third-world nation, a million babies will die this year in the United States, without taking a single breath.

In his book The Revolution: A Manifesto; Ron Paul outlined his opposition to abortion.  Keep in mind I don’t have the book on me or else I would copy down word-for-word, but as it is, I will just have to paraphrase.  This will be subject to later correction.

In his book Congressman Ron Paul (who is also an O.B. doctor) said that he was working at a hospital and he walked into a room without having full knowledge of what was going on.  Doctors and nurses were performing an abortion.  Anyway, they pulled the small baby out and placed it in a bucket, setting it off to the side of the room.  Now here is the real sick part: they comforted the woman having he abortion.  And that baby that knows no sin, no strife, no pain, only love; had to die.  For what?

In case you did not know; here is how a partial birth abortion is conducted:

1) Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby’s legs with forceps.

2) The baby’s leg is pulled out into the birth canal.

3) The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head.

4) The abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the skull.

5) The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child’s brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.

Like myself, are you disgusted?  It’s a pretty terrible world to think that someone would think of their own selfish future instead bringing life to an unborn child.  Of course, like most things in this life, there are extenuating circumstances; like threat to the mother’s life.  But outright abortion encourages one thing above all: a promiscuous lifestyle.  Have sex, get pregnant, have an abortion, no worries, right?

For someone who doesn’t believe God speaks condemning of abortion, consider the following:

They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to the demons; they poured out innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters… and the land was polluted with blood. Then the anger of the lord was kindled against his people, and He abhorred his heritage; he gave them into the hands of the nations, so that those who hated them ruled over them. Their enemies oppressed them, and they were brought into subjection under their power.” (See Psalm 106:37-43)

With that being said, let’s get to the news.

Population control by forced Abortion…

As if it weren’t bad enough that the Obama administration is infested with Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission members (TC), and Bilderberg members; there seems to be an untold member – John P. Holdren.  It should be no secret that Barack Obama is for abortion.  In fact, he has voted for it time and time again.  He even thinks that partial birth abortion should stay legal.  So why is it too far out of the American people’s mind to think that he would have an elitist who condones “forced abortion” to curtail the “exploding world population”.

In his 1977 book Ecoscience, Holdren advocated forced abortion:

On page 837, Holdren and his co-authors write, “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

He then advocates having single mothers, especially minors, having their babies put up for adoption or forced to have an abortion.

One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

Holdren’s scary and atrocious support of abortion gets even worse:

From page 787-8, ““Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

“The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Something such as this should come as no surprise.  After all, this is a presidency that does not know the meaning of the word transparency.  Our liberties are becoming more and more limited, and, we as Americans, have the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s